Discovery: Equilibrium of life's Existence theory reminds the possible ending of Human existence on Earth

Equilibrium of life’s Existence

Discovery: “Equilibrium of life Existence” states that “If human or animal will attract in the same gender, then it is the last chance of their existence as they won’t reproduce.” This is what we called Denis Somoso’s theory of “Equilibrium of Life’s Existence”.

Equilibrium is a very used term for science studies but former studies don’t step forward on the effect of equilibrium to the human and animal’s existence on earth. Scientist from around the globe tries to seek answers of the disappearance of many species thousand and million years ago. Their research is back-up with the fossils, footprints and other evidence which thought to live for million years. Another case is the recent discovery of a sea cow fossil in the cave of the subterranean river in Palawan, Philippines which believes that disappeared million years ago. Dinosaurs which are the largest predators on earth thought to exist for so many researchers probe and show evidences but no one could explain how they disappeared. Scientist and biologist declared so many endangered species in the world counting some other human predators like crocodiles, sharks, tigers, and many preys which said to be feared of disappearing so soon.

How the dinosaurs disappeared?

Existing explanations of most scientists are so shallow as how they discovered equilibrium and they could not apply such theory to the existence of human and animals. It is already hundred years of research but none of them questioned about the involvement of “equilibrium” in the disappearance of different species. Their focus is still far from the real cause of the real theory that could solve their problem.

Some researchers tried to explain that the reasons of the disappearance of many species thousands and million years ago; counting the climate change, the myth of flood as written in the Holy Bible and the Meteors or natural calamities.

All of the mentioned reasons are possible cause but the chances could not reach up to the highest proof of evidence and explanation that would convince the jurors that climate change is the reason or the flood or the meteors. If the flood is the reason, then it could be a valid reason in some way as the dinosaurs’ fossils found intact. If the is no current then the animal body will remain its location until it would got rotten. If a meteor, then it is very far from the fact that meteors will destroy the body of the animal which would hit by such gigantic burning object which means no one could see the intact fossils of the dinosaurs. Climate change also is convincing but the climate change on earth is not yet changing fast as the global warming is very minimal. The animals exist in the previous thousand and million years could have choices as the earth have different climate which is a proof of the migrant birds moving from one place to another place to suit the climates they want to live in.

International researchers want to close the arguments but they could not find the valid evidence to be declared as the real reason of the disappearance of different species thousands and million years ago so the scientists are still grasping information and continue researching until the present time.

What is Equilibrium?

Equilibrium is the condition of a system in which competing influences are balanced.

Biology

·         Equilibrioception is the sense of a balance present in humans and animals

·         Equilibrium unfolding is the process of unfolding a protein or RNA molecule by gradually changing its environment

·         Genetic equilibrium is theoretical state in which a population is not evolving

·         Homeostasis is the ability of an open system, especially living organisms, to regulate its internal environment

·         Punctuated equilibrium is theory in evolutionary biology

·         Sedimentation equilibrium is analytical ultracentrifugation method for measuring protein molecular masses in solution

·         Equilibrium Theory (Island biogeography), MacArthur-Wilson theory explaining biodiversity character of ecological islands

Physics

·         Equilibrium figures of Earth and planets (Physical geodesy)

·         Equilibrium mode distribution, the state of fiber optic or waveguide transmission in which the propagation mode does not vary with distance along the fiber or changes in the launch mode

·         Hydrostatic equilibrium, the state of a system in which compression due to gravity is balanced by a pressure gradient force

·         Hyperbolic equilibrium point, a mathematical concept in physics

·         Mechanical equilibrium, the state in which the sum of the forces, and torque, on each particle of the system is zero

·         Radiative equilibrium, the state where the energy radiated is balanced by the energy absorbed

·         Secular equilibrium, a state of radioactive elements in which the production rate of a daughter nucleus is balanced by its own decay rate

·         Thermal equilibrium, a state where an object and its surroundings cease to exchange energy in the form of heat, i.e. they are at the same temperature.

Chemistry

·         Chemical equilibrium, the state in which the concentrations of the reactants and products have no net change over time

·         Diffusion equilibrium, when the concentrations of the diffusing substance in the two compartments are equal

·         Donnan equilibrium, the distribution of ion species between two ionic solutions separated by a semipermeable membrane or boundary

·         Dynamic equilibrium, the state in which two reversible processes occur at the same rate

·         Equilibrium constant, a quantity characterizing a chemical equilibrium in a chemical reaction

·         Partition equilibrium, a type of chromatography that is typically used in GC

·         Quasistatic equilibrium, the quasi-balanced state of a thermodynamic system near to equilibrium in some sense or degree

·         Schlenk equilibrium, a chemical equilibrium named after its discoverer Wilhelm Schlenk taking place in solutions of Grignard reagents

·         Solubility equilibrium, any chemical equilibrium between solid and dissolved states of a compound at saturation

·         Thermodynamic equilibrium, the state of a thermodynamic system which is in thermal, mechanical, and chemical equilibrium

·         Vapor-liquid equilibrium, where the rates of condensation and vapourization of a material are equal

Economics

·         Competitive equilibrium, economic equilibrium when all buyers and sellers are small relative to the market

·         Economic equilibrium, a condition in economics

·         Equilibrium price, the price at which quantity supplied equals quantity demanded

·         General equilibrium theory, a branch of theoretical microeconomics

·         Intertemporal equilibrium, an equilibrium concept over time

·         Lindahl equilibrium, a method proposed by Erik Lindahl for financing public goods

·         Partial equilibrium, one part of the general economic equilibrium

·         Radner equilibrium, an economic concept defined by economist Roy Radner in the context of general equilibrium

·         Recursive competitive equilibrium, an economic equilibrium concept associated with a dynamic program

·         Static equilibrium (economics), the intersection of supply and demand in any market

·         Sunspot equilibrium, an economic equilibrium in which nonfundamental factors affect prices or quantities

·         Underemployment equilibrium, a situation in Keynesian economics with a persistent shortfall relative to full employment and potential output

Game theory

 

·         Correlated equilibrium, a solution concept in game theory that is more general than the well-known Nash equilibrium

·         Nash equilibrium, a solution concept in game theory involving two or more players

·         Quasi-perfect equilibrium, a refinement of Nash Equilibrium for extensive form games due to Eric van Damme

·         Sequential equilibrium, a refinement of Nash Equilibrium for extensive form games due to David M. Kreps and Robert Wilson

·         Symmetric equilibrium, in game theory, an equilibrium where all players use the same strategy

·         Trembling hand perfect equilibrium assumes that the players, through a "slip of the hand" or tremble, may choose unintended strategies

·         Proper equilibrium due to Roger B. Myerson, where costly trembles are made with smaller probabilities

 

Other Equilibrium

Social equilibrium - a system in which there is a dynamic working balance among its interdependent parts.

Equilibration, the means of cognitive development in Jean Piaget's cognitive developmental theory

Equilibrium of life’s Existence theory - “If human or animal will attract in the same gender, then it is the last chance of their existence as they won’t reproduce.” This is what we called Denis Somoso’s theory of “Equilibrium of Life’s Existence.

The Theory of Equilibrium in Animal and Human Existence (“Equilibrium of life Existence”)

So many branches of Science used the Equilibrium Theory but none of them dig up for the “Equilibrium of life Existence”. The theory of “equilibrium of life existence which is formulated by Denis Somoso, a Filipino researcher (somosophils@aol.com) doesn’t have so much thing to prove as different branches of Science studies proved already the equilibrium state. The application of equilibrium would be apply also in many games like “Mahjong” for example. When two the same or twin structure will appear together it will lead them to balance or “zero”. In Accounting, the problem would be solved only when it reach up to its equilibrium as balance or zero. For human; if two men attract its other then it is the end as they could not reproduce and it is the last chance of their existence. The same thing will apply to women and even to animals.

The Denis Somoso “Equilibrium of life Existence” states that “If human or animal will attract in the same gender, then it is the last chance of their existence as they won’t reproduce.”  You could not notice how does it start to make human existence balance? The Neutrality exists and grows fast. One of the common events that would meet the theory of human equilibrium is the existence of sexual neutrality of human and animals; the attraction of the same sex and end up to nothing, as no more reproduction and it could be the last chance of their existence. It is somewhat amazing for me to discover last 1999 a male homosexual goat, Denis Somoso said. A male goat who wants to have sex only with other male goats is somewhat unusual. This is quite confusing for me but it exist then I begun to open my mind how does it happen and only equilibrium theory explains everything that at the right time, everything will reached to its highest state and it is the equilibrium state as balance, he added.

The vastly increasing of number of homosexual between men and women, and even animals is a sign of its nearly falling into equilibrium state. It is not abnormal but it is just a sign that everything affects the maturity of its states and fastly seeking to reach its equilibrium state. Think of it, what will happen if the existence of human will reached to its equilibrium state, neutrality, no reproduction, do you think that the human will remain to exist in the earth? Or another evolution of new living creatures will form?

Do you think that science could invent a medicine to stop homosexuality to stop or halt or even slow the progress of homosexuality? If science could make it then it could delay the disappearance of human on earth. Do you think how many years left for the human’s final state as equilibrium? Maybe homosexuality gain persecution because it looks abnormal as woman fells like man and man fells like woman, how does it mean? It simply means neutrality and it simply means trying to reach up to its equilibrium and soon to disappear without anything left. No reproduction..

This is the Denis Somoso Theory of Equilibrium for human existence “Equilibrium of life Existence”. You may send comments and reactions for my newly founded theory (somosophils@aol.com).

 

Continue reading

USA will Support the Philippines' Spratly issue but Filipinos - cautious might betray again

A United Nations convention is clear on what constitutes sovereign territory, and the United States is prepared to do whatever is asked of it by the Philippines in connection with the South China Sea / West Philippine Sea dispute, US Ambassador Harry Thomas Jr. said Monday (June 13, 2011) in Makati. Thomas Statement is absolutely opposite of the statement of Rebecca Thomson; US spokesperson saying “The US will not support the Philippine Spratly Issue as they are out of the Issue. Even USA is not united of their stands for the Spratlys issue.

 “We will do whatever we’re asked,” Thomas told The STAR during a visit to the newspaper office, when asked if the US would be willing to participate in the settlement of the territorial dispute.

But he quickly added, “What we want to say is right now we believe consistently that is not something for us to do. We have not been asked to do that. And we can’t deal with hypotheticals.”

Later, when pressed about US participation in negotiations, he said, “We have not been invited.”

Thomas spoke as China warned external powers to stay out of the overlapping territorial claims in the Spratly Islands.

Reuters reported Monday (June 13, 2011) from Beijing that the warning was contained in a commentary in the main military newspaper Liberation Army Daily, which is controlled by China’s Communist Party, and where articles are vetted to reflect official thinking.

President Aquino welcomed Thomas’ statement as he noted the military power of China and its huge population.

“We don’t want any hostility to break out,” Aquino said at Malacañang, even as he reaffirmed that islands in the West Philippine Sea are within undisputed Philippine territory under an international convention.

“Perhaps the presence of our treaty partner, which is the United States of America, ensures that all of us will have freedom of navigation, will conform to international law,” Aquino added.

Earlier Monday (June 13, 2011), Thomas said the US would stand with the Philippines in all issues.

“I want to assure you – on all subjects, we in the United States are with the Philippines. The Philippines and the United States are strategic treaty allies. We are partners,” Thomas said at the launching of the US-supported National Renewable Energy Program in Makati City.

“We will continue to consult and work with each other on all issues, including the South China Sea and Spratly Islands,” Thomas said.

The Philippines has protested Chinese military activities in the West Philippine Sea, which is within the country’s territory as defined under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

The UNCLOS, Thomas said, is “pretty clear on what is Philippine territory.”

Thomas mentioned that US President Barack Obama has said Washington supports the 2002 Code of Conduct in the South China Sea under UNCLOS.

Among other things, the Code of Conduct calls for all claimants to sit together and settle the dispute, he said.

President Aquino is so thankful

President Aquino welcomed Thomas’ declaration.

“We are grateful to the (US), especially when they reiterated that we are strategic partners, we have a treaty between us,” Aquino said when asked for his reaction to Thomas’ statement in a press briefing later at Malacañang.

The President stressed the importance of adhering to international laws, specifically UNCLOS.

“What that law says is that you have exclusive economic authority or exclusive economic zone extending 200 (nautical) miles from your continental shelf,” Aquino said.

“Reed (Recto) Bank, which is the subject of incidents lately, is located 80 (nautical) miles off Palawan, the closest of our contention in the Spratlys, the closest China (has) is 576 (nautical) miles if I remember correctly - 576 is obviously greater than 200,” he added.

“Why should there be a dispute if we are conforming to international law?” Aquino asked.

“Of course, they are a superpower, more than 10 times our population, we don’t want any hostility to break out. Perhaps the presence of our treaty partner which is the United States of America ensures that all of us will have freedom of navigation, will conform to international law,” the President said.

Deputy presidential spokesperson Abigail Valte said in a press briefing that the statement of the US ambassador “reaffirms even more our commitment to finding diplomatic and a peaceful resolution on the issues that we have in the West Philippine Sea.”

Valte said the statement was welcome because “everybody knows that we always have good relationship with the United States and so with other countries as well, even if we have issues with them.”

But Valte said there was no need to elaborate on the kind of assistance that the US is prepared to offer in the event of armed hostilities with China.

“We are in the process of trying to find a peaceful resolution to the conflict that we are in the middle of. So we do not want to make any statement that would be contrary to that position,” she said.

“I think with or without that clear statement, we have always been firm on our position on the issue. I don’t think anybody can doubt our resolve to have a resolution, a peaceful and diplomatic resolution on the issue,” Valte said.

“Our resolve cannot be questioned and that we will do so, we will pursue such resolution through diplomatic moves,” Valte said.

Valte said there should be no talk of military assistance yet because all claimant-countries were talking and seeking a peaceful resolution to the issue.

Chinese Ambassador Liu Jianchao said on Saturday that “military means” was not an option for China.

Authorities have recorded six to seven incursions into Philippine-claimed areas by Chinese vessels and aircraft.

Drilon appeal for Peace in Spratlys

Sen. Franklin Drilon, an administration ally, called for an end to incendiary statements on the West Philippine Sea issue.

“All sides should exercise calm and avoid issuing statements because this is a very sensitive issue. We must defend our sovereignty but we must also be very careful in issuing statements,” Drilon said.

Drilon emphasized that only the Department of Foreign Affairs should be allowed to issue statements because the issue involves diplomacy and foreign relations.

Drilon also said the country’s relations with China cannot be easily set aside. He was apparently referring to a call by Albay Gov. Joey Salceda for a boycott of Chinese products.

He also stressed that the issue should be discussed multilaterally, or taken up before the International Court of Justice.

The Philippines and other countries in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), he added, may take a united stand against China’s alleged bullying.

“This cannot be resolved on a bilateral or one-on-one basis. China is too big so the discussions should be multilateral, meaning the claimants in ASEAN should form a body to face China,” Drilon said.

Senate committee on foreign relations chair Loren Legarda also pushed for diplomacy in resolving the issue.

“It is to the region’s and the international community’s collective interest that the parties remain committed to exploring ways for building trust and confidence on the basis of equality and mutual respect,” Legarda said.

Cagayan Rep. Juan Ponce Enrile Jr., for his part, called for sobriety.

“Let the concerned agencies do the talking instead of (Palace) spokespersons who may not have a full grasp of West Philippine Sea, diplomacy, conflict management, and negotiations,” he said.

“When it comes to foreign policy, we should speak with one voice. We cannot compromise our foreign relations from interpretations made by spokespersons who muddle the handling of a potential conflict,” he said.

Enrile decried the apparently contradictory statements made by presidential spokesman Edwin Lacierda and Valte, his deputy, on the Spratlys issue.

He said that while Lacierda was quoted as saying that the country is “committed to a multilateral approach to the resolution of claims in the Spratlys,” Valte invoked the RP-US Mutual Defense Treaty (MDT).

Enrile said the agencies that should speak for the country on the issue are the DFA and the Department of National Defense.

Enrile’s father, Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile, Sen. Joker Arroyo and other senators have expressed doubts on whether the MDT can compel the US to help the Philippines in case of an armed confrontation with China.

Enrile said the best way to resolve the conflict would be through negotiations under the framework of the UNCLOS.

Boycott All Chinese Product

Rep. Enrile also chided Salceda for calling for a boycott of Chinese-made goods. Salceda belongs to the ruling Liberal Party.

“Why on earth are we calling for a boycott of Chinese goods? China is bigger than the Philippines in terms of consumer market, so how can we, as a neighbor, even contemplate about it?” he asked.

“As responsible elected officials, we should refrain from instigating a trade war with the third biggest buyer of Philippine exports. The saber rattling is uncalled for. Let’s put a stop to that,” Rep. Enrile said.

“We should instead focus on setting up our national coast defense system to protect our baselines and buy and patronize Filipino products so that we help our economy,” he said.

Sen. Ralph Recto also slammed Salceda for his boycott call.

“The right response is to increase our trade and investments with China and perhaps, maybe with the right growth formula, we can get even economically years from now,” he added.

He said that it would be a “big economic victory” for the Philippines if it closes its $900-million trade deficit with China.

The country imported $7 billion worth of goods from China in 2010 as against its exports of a little over $6 billion.

Recto likewise noted that as part of the emerging economies and touted by respected global bodies as among the Top 25 countries with strong economies by 2025, the Philippines should “act accordingly” and should not be “boycott happy.”

“We should not only engage China diplomatically but also through business,” Recto stressed.

“The Spratlys question should be settled peacefully. You can’t be saber rattling with China. It’s our biggest trading neighbor,” Recto said.

“An action like that (boycott call) has repercussions. They can tell all you Filipino people in China, go home. They can call for a boycott of all Filipino products. I don’t know who will lose in this one. So we should take it easy,” Sen. Enrile said.

Recto said the Armed Forces of the Philippines should beef up its arsenal and capability “not for arms race but to protect our coral reefs and fishermen.”

Recto said the AFP should start buying modern equipment and fleet.

“We should start buying some of these equipment and I don’t care if we buy them from China,” he said.

 

Continue reading